Night fell over Chí Hòa Prison. Along the corridor, prisoners heard a solitary voice reciting poetry from Cell No. 6. [1]
The man behind that voice was Vũ Hoàng Chương. Only a few years earlier, he had led the Vietnamese PEN Center from 1969 to 1973 and had represented southern writers at various international literary conferences. [2] [3] Yet, by 1976, he found himself confined within a communist prison.
Mai Thảo, a writer who was active in southern Việt Nam before 1975 and was one of the poet’s closest friends, recorded the account of those nighttime recitations from a fellow prisoner. Mai Thảo’s records are among the few surviving accounts of Vũ Hoàng Chương’s final days, including his more than four months at Chí Hòa. When the gravely ill poet was finally brought home, he said almost nothing about his time in prison.
Vũ Hoàng Chương had long held a towering place in Vietnamese poetry as a whole, having made his name in the prewar years before the country’s partition. Rising to prominence during the New Poetry movement, he was regarded as a leading figure of the 20th century. [5] His notable collections include “Thơ say” (“Drunken Poems”), “Mây” (“Clouds”), “Rừng phong” (“Maple Forest”), “Hoa đăng” (“Festival Lanterns”), and “Lửa từ bi” (“The Fire of Compassion”). These lines are from “Phương xa” (“Far Away”): [6]
“…We were born into the wrong century,
A lonely few, weighed down by desolation.
This proud, cold world has no room for simple souls.
Oh boat, dear boat! Take us to some untouched shore…”
After moving to Sài Gòn in 1954, he continued to teach and write, attending international literary conferences in Belgium, Thailand, Yugoslavia, and Ivory Coast. [7] “Hoa đăng” won the National Poetry Award in 1959, and in 1972, he received the National Literature Award while also being nominated for the Nobel Prize.
In early 2023, when the nominations for the 1972 Nobel Prize in literature were made public, several state news outlets reported that Vũ Hoàng Chương had been nominated. [4] However, none described what he endured in a communist prison near the end of his life.
Vũ Hoàng Chương lived and wrote in the South for more than two decades. His towering literary legacy once led Mai Thảo to believe that the communist authorities would leave him alone.
Mai Thảo was wrong.

Resistance or Silence
On May 3, 1975, just three days after the war ended, literary critic Vương Trí Nhàn flew from Gia Lâm to Tân Sơn Nhất, operating as a North Vietnamese soldier and a military journalist for the Văn nghệ Quân đội (Military Literature) magazine. [8]
In his May 9 diary entry, he recorded a talk given in Sài Gòn by Trần Bạch Đằng, a southern communist leader who had served as secretary of the Sài Gòn–Gia Định Party Committee and overseen propaganda for the Central Office for South Việt Nam. [9] [10]
Vương Trí Nhàn’s hurried notes captured Trần Bạch Đằng’s vicious assessment of southern intellectuals, writers, and artists:
“80% of intellectuals are scoundrels,” “the label ‘writer or artist’ means nothing in itself,” and “there must be punishment. Our children have been poisoned. We must not let talent get in the way.” [11]
Furthermore, Trần Bạch Đằng declared:
“They have no standing whatsoever. They cannot even be called the grandchildren of Liberation, Literature, and Arts. They aren’t even worth a piece of its shit.”
After April 30, this rhetoric became policy; printing houses, publishers, bookstores, newspapers, and private publications across Sài Gòn were ordered to suspend operations pending review. [12]
Hồ Trường An—another writer who helped assess and classify books at the National Library after April 1975—later detailed how the new authorities systematically censored southern works by sorting them into one of six categories: [13] [14]
- Category A covered any works opposing communism.
- Category B was reserved for books deemed “decadent,” which included writing about sex, improper relationships, alcohol, or opium.
- Category C targeted romantic literature that celebrated personal love, accusing it of turning away from society’s suffering.
- Category D encompassed philosophy, religion, and capitalist works that were considered to weaken the revolutionary struggle.
- Category E, in contrast, was for works judged “wholesome, constructive, and progressive,” such as realist literature, defenses of the oppressed, and critiques of the Ngô Đình Diệm and Nguyễn Văn Thiệu governments.
- Category F, the highest classification, was exclusively for works grounded in Marxist thought that contributed to the revolutionary struggle.
According to Hồ Trường An, Vũ Hoàng Chương’s work was condemned to Category B—“decadent”—because his poetry frequently explored themes of alcohol and opium. [15] Ultimately, he became one of 15 authors whose entire bodies of work were categorically banned.
Mai Thảo observed that most southern writers ceased writing altogether after the communists took control of Sài Gòn. [16] Drawing on their experiences from 1945, they learned that writers wishing to preserve their self-respect faced only two choices: “resistance or silence.”
Vũ Hoàng Chương, however, chose neither; he simply continued living as a poet, acting as though the South had never changed hands.
Despite his books being banned and his friends being taken away, visitors continued to gather at Gác Bút—the name he gave his new home—to drink tea, read poetry, and discuss Tang dynasty verse. He kept writing, and Mai Thảo estimated that he composed about 60 poems during his final months. [17] Tragically, authorities confiscated most of those manuscripts on the day of his arrest.
One of the few surviving pieces was “Vịnh tranh gà lợn” (“On a Painting of Chickens and Pigs”), penned for the Lunar New Year of the Dragon. While its language was oblique, featuring references to “walls have ears, poems bring peril” and “whose heart is red, whose eyes look kindly,” [18] readers could easily recognize the oppressive society it mirrored:
“Morning and noon are surely bright; at dusk, who can say?
Chickens and pigs make a clamor, throwing the picture into disarray.
They say walls have ears, and poems bring peril;
Who knows whose heart is red, whose eyes look kindly?
How often have brother chickens lost their sight?
Within the pig’s yin and yang, a little heart remains true.
Enough of clucking; cease your grunting.
Hear the dragon’s song resound with a new refrain.”
Security Forces Surround Gác Bút
Drawing on the account of Đinh Thục Oanh, the wife of Vũ Hoàng Chương, Mai Thảo wrote that four Jeeps carrying more than 20 security officers crossed Calmette Bridge on the morning of April 13, 1976. [19] They stopped outside a small alley in Cây Bàng ward, where armed officers quickly spread out to surround the streets around Gác Bút. One officer reportedly claimed that they were there “to round up an entire gang of dangerous robbers.”
The commotion of officers forcing the door open, coupled with his wife’s frightened cries, woke Vũ Hoàng Chương. He simply sat up, draped a brocade robe over his shoulders, and remained upright and motionless on his mat. As communist security officers entered to read out the arrest warrant and his charges, the poet sat silently. His wife, however, protested:
“What has my husband done? Why are you arresting him?”
The officer in charge replied that “after the revolution’s remarkable victory,” Vũ Hoàng Chương, “the reactionary poet,” had continued “writing poems against the revolution and circulating them throughout Sài Gòn.”
The ensuing search lasted until midday, resulting in the confiscation of books, papers, and manuscripts. When it concluded, two officers pulled the poet to his feet and supported him down the narrow staircase. Neighbors who had crowded the alley watched as a frail man in his 60s, still dressed in his brocade robe, was escorted through a sea of armed men to a waiting vehicle.
From Gác Bút, Vũ Hoàng Chương was taken directly to Chí Hòa Prison.

“I Stop and Close My Eyes Tonight”
The next four months remain largely a blank. Mai Thảo wrote that the family did not know how Vũ Hoàng Chương was treated, what he was given to eat or drink, or when his illness worsened. [20] There was only a fellow prisoner’s account, which noted that he was fragile, was repeatedly carried away for medical examinations, and could still be heard reciting poetry from his cell late at night.
By the time prison authorities finally returned him to Gác Bút in early September 1976, he was already dying. Five days later, on Sept. 6, 1976, he passed away in Sài Gòn.
Information was so restricted that accounts of his death reached the outside world in wildly conflicting forms. A Feb. 23, 1977, report in the Tulsa Daily World claimed that the poet was forced to dig ditches and died of exhaustion at the bottom of one. [21]
A 1993 publication in Paris, “Bốn mươi năm thơ Việt Nam 1945-1985” (“Forty Years of Vietnamese Poetry, 1945-1985”), featured an account by Thi Vũ stating that authorities arrested him on May 26, 1976—one day after he recited “Lửa từ bi” during a Buddha’s Birthday celebration at Vạn Hạnh University. This version claimed he died in October 1976. [22]
Another article by Hoàng Quốc Hải, published in issue 126 of Sông Hương magazine on Nov. 1, 1998, described a meeting with Thục Oanh. The account reported there made no mention of imprisonment, stating only that he died of illness on Oct. 7, 1976. [23]
However, all these accounts differ significantly from Mai Thảo’s recollections, which provide the most reliable record of his final days. [24]
When Vũ Hoàng Chương was brought back to Gác Bút, his body was failing, but his mind remained clear. He said almost nothing about his imprisonment. On his second day home, he briefly lost consciousness. Thinking he had passed, Đinh Thục Oanh began to cry, prompting him to open his eyes.
“I’m still here,” he said. He then joked, “Even under arrest, I still had some standing. I had a prime minister looking after me.”
He was referring to Dr. Phan Huy Quát, a former prime minister of the Republic of Vietnam, who was imprisoned in the adjoining cell at Chí Hòa.
On the afternoon of his third day home, a bout of pain left him writhing. When his wife asked whether he had been abused in prison, he replied simply:
“They didn’t need to torment me. Starving me was enough to kill me.”
That was almost all he shared about his more than four months in captivity.
At midnight on Sept. 6, 1976, five days after his release, Vũ Hoàng Chương took his last breath on the floor of the small upstairs room in Cây Bàng ward.
When relatives brought a death notice to the newspaper Tin Sáng, the paper accepted their payment, only to return it later, explaining that the security authorities of the city Party Committee had forbidden publication.
Residents of Cây Bàng ward were barred from offering condolences or paying their respects. Left with no money for a funeral, the family relied on the Venerable Thích Đức Nhuận and Từ Mẫn to arrange everything from a coffin to a burial plot.
Even for the 50th-day memorial, the family did not dare hold a ceremony at home. They gathered instead at Giác Minh Pagoda, where about 15 people—including Nguyễn Hoạt, Bàng Bá Lân, Nguyễn Hiến Lê and Vương Hồng Sển—quietly paid their respects. Before leaving, Nguyễn Hiến Lê took Oanh’s hand and said,
“Please don’t grieve too much. In death, he has escaped. Those of us still here are living as though we were dead. We wish we could be free as he is, but we cannot.”
Mai Thảo remembered his close friend this way:
“[…] Among the communists, Vũ Hoàng Chương still lived freely and with dignity, as though there were no communists. As though no bright red flag flew outside in Cây Bàng ward. As though no security net had closed around Khánh Hội. As though the South had not fallen. As though everything were as before.” [25]
Honored by his peers as a “master poet,” Vũ Hoàng Chương departed the world as gently as the verses he left behind. [26]
“…My steps are weary, wearier still, my gaze.
I stop and close my eyes tonight.
Set my cypress boat adrift, without an oar, upon a sea of mist,
And let it float wherever it may, through a world of drunken dreams…”
Thúc Kháng wrote this article in Vietnamese and published it in Luật Khoa Magazine on September 6, 2026. The Vietnamese Magazine translated it into English.
- Mai Thảo, “The Final Months with Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Du Tử Lê, February 18, 2023, link.
- Đặng Tiến, “Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Diễn Đàn Forum, September 6, 2011, last modified April 12, 2016, link.
- “Vietnamese PEN Center—Chapter II: Activities of the PEN Center,” Nhà Văn Nhật Tiến, August 18, 2016, link.
- “Poet Vũ Hoàng Chương Was Nominated for the Nobel Prize in 1972,” VnExpress, February 11, 2023, link.
- Vũ Hoàng Chương, “Poems by Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Thi Viện, March 29, 2005, link.
- Vũ Hoàng Chương, “Far Away,” Thi Viện, June 4, 2005, link.
- Đặng Tiến, “Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Diễn Đàn Forum, September 6, 2011, last modified April 12, 2016, link.
- Vương Trí Nhàn, “Some Hurried Notes from Sài Gòn in Early May 1975,” 53.
- hải đăng, “Some Hurried Notes from Sài Gòn in Early May 1975,” Vương Trí Nhàn (blog), April 22, 2019, link.
- Vương Trí Nhàn, “Some Hurried Notes from Sài Gòn in Early May 1975,” 58.
- hải đăng, “Some Hurried Notes from Sài Gòn in Early May 1975,” Vương Trí Nhàn (blog), April 22, 2019, link.
- Dự án 1975, “1975—Week 18: Viet Cong Nationalize Property in the South; U.S. Ends Evacuations, Welcomes First Vietnamese Arrivals,” Luật Khoa 1975, May 4, 2025, link.
- Hồ Trường An, “Vietnam’s Cultural Purge,” 3.
- Hồ Trường An, “Vietnam’s Cultural Purge,” 4.
- Hồ Trường An, “Vietnam’s Cultural Purge,” Index on Censorship 7, no. 4 (1978): 3–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/03064227808532804.
- Mai Thảo, “The Final Months with Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Du Tử Lê, February 18, 2023, link.
- See note 16.
- Vũ Hoàng Chương, “On a Painting of Chickens and Pigs,” Thi Viện, July 24, 2018, link.
- See note 16.
- See note 16.
- Tulsa World, February 23, 1977, 17, Newspapers.com, link.
- Thi Vũ, Forty Years of Vietnamese Poetry, 1945–1985 (1993), Google Books, link.
- Hoàng Quốc Hải, “Meeting Thục Oanh, Remembering the Poetic Genius of Vũ Hoàng Chương,” Sông Hương, no. 126, November 1, 1998, archived January 14, 2014, at the Internet Archive, link.
- See note 16.
- See note 16.
- Vũ Hoàng Chương, “Halfway to Death,” Thi Viện, June 4, 2005, link.












