Become a Member for $9.99/month

Lê Giang wrote this Vietnamese article, published in Luật Khoa Magazine on June 4, 2025.

Freedom of Expression in Liberalism Liberal ideology considers freedom of expression a natural, inalienable human right. It is seen as a fundamental condition that allows individuals to think independently, form personal will, and engage in public life as responsible citizens. However, this freedom is not boundless. Liberalism advocates for maximum protection of free expression, balanced with minimal restrictions.

British philosopher John Stuart Mill, in his classic work On Liberty (1859), laid out a foundational argument that still influences discussions about free speech today: "The worth of a state in the long run is the worth of the individuals composing it." Mill argued that the state should only interfere with an individual's actions if those actions directly harm others. This is his harm principle , which establishes a philosophical boundary for limiting freedom of expression.

Mill also declared, "The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs." From this perspective, Mill drew a clear distinction between offensive speech and harmful speech .

While individuals are free to express views that go against the majority, the government, or even societal norms, this right does not extend to speech that incites violence, slanders others, or causes tangible harm. Speech that promotes discrimination, incites violence, or threatens public order crosses acceptable boundaries and is no longer protected.

Ultimately, freedom of expression is not a license to say anything; it is the right to speak within limits that prevent harm to others. Defining these boundaries of harm is the most democratic way to maintain a public sphere that is both free and healthy.

Restricted Speech Categories According to John Stuart Mill

Type of Speech

Limitation Status

Reason According to John Stuart Mill

Criticism of politics, the state, religion

Not restricted

Does not cause tangible harm; promotes debate and social progress

Shocking or discomforting speech

Not restricted

May be unpleasant but does not cause material harm or incite danger

Personal storytelling (memoirs, art)

Not restricted

No direct negative impact; falls under personal expression

Unintentional misinformation

Depends on context

Not restricted unless it causes serious confusion or harms public order

Harmful fake news

Restricted

Causes serious consequences (e.g., panic, public health risks)

Defamation and slander

Restricted

Direct harm to a person’s reputation and dignity

Hate speech and incitement to violence

Restricted

Leads to discrimination, hatred, or violence beyond individual liberty

Calls for violent overthrow

Restricted

Results in concrete harm to society or institutions

Extremist propaganda (terrorism, fascism)

Restricted

Aims to incite violence or dominate others through fear

Defamation

Restricted

Harms individual dignity with false information

Disclosure of classified information

Restricted

Threatens national security

Soliciting minors into illegal activity

Restricted

Protects minors from abuse or exploitation

Freedom of Expression in Marxism–Leninism From a Marxist-Leninist perspective, freedom of expression is not an absolute concept. Instead, it is intrinsically linked to socioeconomic conditions and class divisions, viewed as a product of production relations, class struggle, and a tool for revolutionary purposes.

As Karl Marx wrote in The Communist Manifesto : "The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class. " This statement highlights a clear worldview: in a class-divided society, economic power dictates speech, the press, and ideology. Marx and Engels contended that "freedom of expression" in bourgeois society is merely a guise used by the ruling class to legitimize its voice and suppress revolutionary discourse.

Lenin further reinforced this during the Russian Revolution, asserting: "Freedom of the press in bourgeois society is freedom for the rich to own the press." Consequently, true freedom of expression, for Marxists-Leninists, only exists when it serves the proletariat, advancing the goal of eradicating oppression and building a just society.

Lenin argued that during revolutionary struggles and socialist construction, restrictions on speech are necessary to protect revolutionary achievements and to counter reactionary forces, bourgeois ideology, and subversive rhetoric. He once stressed: "Freedom of speech cannot be used to undermine the revolution, spread hostile ideas, or weaken faith in the revolutionary government."

In practice, many Marxist-Leninist regimes have institutionalized ideologically aligned journalism, often called the "revolutionary press," which remains loyal to the Party. They tightly control what they categorize as "reactionary," "distorted," or "provocative" views.

This control is justified by the principle that "freedom cannot be separated from class responsibility." From this perspective, speech is redefined as a tool for social development, political stability, and ideological guidance. Individual expression that clashes with the revolutionary community's goals is subject to restriction, and even suppression.

Freedom of Expression in Việt Nam – Part 4: Western Ideas and Việt Nam’s Struggle for Free Speech

Lê Giang

Related Posts

The Ecology of Authoritarianism in Việt Nam and the Activism It Shapes

Solitary Confinement in Việt Nam: Punishment Within

Economic Triumphs and Human Rights Failures in the EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

The Fine of 7.5 Million Đồng: The Rising Cost of Free Speech on Social Media in Việt Nam

Việt Nam’s Silence on Iranian Unrest Shows the Limits—and Morality—of its Diplomacy

Are Vietnamese Values Compatible with Universal Human Rights?

Communist Party of Việt Nam Restructures Internal Organization Ahead of 2026 National Congress

The Wave of FDI in Việt Nam and Cheap Labor – Final Part: Hurdles in the Shift to Green FDI and High-Tech Investments

OPINIONS

Việt Nam’s Leaked ‘2nd U.S. Invasion’ Plan and the War Against Its Own People

Economic Triumphs and Human Rights Failures in the EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

The Hiup Fake Milk Scandal: A Failure of Governance or a Betrayal of Public Trust?

POPULAR STORIES

Memory in Print: The Death and Resurrection of South Vietnamese Literature

Việt Nam 2025: 9 Key Events That Reshaped the Country

Hà Nội’s Trống Đồng Stadium: A Development Boost or Urban Showmanship?

Việt Nam’s Leaked ‘2nd U.S. Invasion’ Plan and the War Against Its Own People

The First 18 Months: Assessing Tô Lâm’s Impact on Việt Nam

Freedom of Expression in Việt Nam – Part 4: Western Ideas and Việt Nam’s Struggle for Free Speech

Freedom of Expression in Liberalism

Become a Member for $9.99/month

Related Posts

OPINIONS

POPULAR STORIES

Discover more from The Vietnamese Magazine