Trịnh Văn Quyết, a former real estate and aviation tycoon, has made a controversial public appearance while officially serving a prison sentence, prompting renewed scrutiny about the enforcement of penalties for economic crimes in Việt Nam.
On Jan. 26, 2026, Quyết was photographed at the South Korean Embassy in Hà Nội, smiling and presenting a model aircraft to the ambassador during a business gathering. The images, which circulated widely on social media and in some state-linked outlets, offered no context as to why a convicted felon serving a prison term was attending a high-level diplomatic function.
Formerly the chairman of the FLC Group, Quyết was sentenced to 21 years in prison in August 2024 for fraud and stock market manipulation. His conviction was initially hailed as a victory for Việt Nam’s anti-corruption and market-discipline campaign.
However, in June 2025, an appellate court drastically reduced his sentence to seven years, citing mitigating factors such as partial restitution of damages and cooperation during proceedings. His sister, a co-conspirator in the case, was released around the same time.
While the sentence reduction had already concerned legal observers and investors, Quyết’s apparent freedom of movement has intensified scrutiny. Although Vietnamese law permits temporary release for specific reasons like medical treatment, such privileges are rarely granted so visibly in high-profile cases.
Currently, no official statement has clarified whether Quyết’s presence at the embassy was due to a temporary release, escorted leave, or some other form of special permission.
A Pattern of Privilege
This was not the first time Quyết has been seen in public while serving his sentence. In late 2025, images surfaced of him at a major airport, contradicting claims that he was in poor health and required medical care. In both instances, authorities remained silent, providing no documentation or legal justification for his presence outside prison walls.
This lack of transparency has reignited public speculation and criticism. Social media users have sharply contrasted the leniency shown to wealthy and well-connected elites with the harsh treatment of political dissidents, journalists, and activists, who typically serve full sentences under strict conditions.
This disparity has also revived debates suggesting that despite the high-profile nature of Việt Nam’s anti-corruption and market-discipline campaign, judicial outcomes for the wealthy often hinge on restitution negotiations, political considerations, and behind-the-scenes bargaining rather than the severity of the crime.
Sentence reductions, suspended enforcement, and selective transparency have become recurring features in major economic cases.
For investors, the implications are severe. The collapse of FLC Group inflicted massive losses on shareholders and rattled confidence in Việt Nam’s capital markets. While regulators have vowed to restore trust through enhancing corporate governance and enforcing decisive punishment, the optics of a convicted market manipulator attending diplomatic galas undermine these efforts.
The symbolism of Quyết’s visit to the South Korean Embassy was particularly pointed. By presenting a model aircraft—a clear reference to Bamboo Airways, the airline FLC once controlled—Quyết signaled a continued claim to relevance in the business world, regardless of the legal judgment against him.
Silence and Privilege
To date, neither the Ministry of Public Security nor the court system has issued a public comment regarding Quyết’s status. Similarly, state media coverage has been muted and carefully framed, avoiding any direct discussion of the legal justification for his appearance. This silence reflects a broader pattern in sensitive cases involving elite figures, where information is tightly managed and accountability remains opaque.
Trịnh Văn Quyết’s quiet reappearance is more than a mere curiosity; it highlights the enduring tensions within Việt Nam’s governance. It illustrates the conflict between the rule of law and discretionary power, and between the public promise of equal justice and the reality of persistent privilege.
As long as the authorities fail to address these questions, this case will continue to symbolize the unresolved contradictions at the heart of Việt Nam’s political-economic system.
___
Sùng Chính wrote this article in Vietnamese, and Luật Khoa Magazine published it on Jan. 30, 2026. The Vietnamese Magazine has the copyrights for the English version.
