The Vietnamese Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Vietnam Briefing
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
  • Opinion-Section
  • Society
  • Economy
  • About Us
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
  • News
    • Vietnam Briefing
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
  • Opinion-Section
  • Society
  • Economy
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
The Vietnamese Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Hà Nội Party Committee Issues Directive 16 on Red River Megaproject, Says Residents Show ‘High Consensus,’

Hoàng Nam by Hoàng Nam
12 June 2026
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Hà Nội Party Committee Issues Directive 16 on Red River Megaproject, Says Residents Show ‘High Consensus,’

Photo: Hải Long/Dân Trí Newspaper.

RELATED POSTS

Hà Nội Red River Megaproject: Bồ Đề Ward Authorities Warn Residents Against Alleged ‘Incitement’

Hà Nội Red River Residents March Through Streets; Police Advise to File Petitions

Bồ Đề Ward Residents Displaced for State President’s Office Housing 

The Latest: On June 11, the Hà Nội Party Committee issued Directive No. 16 on strengthening the leadership and direction of party committees at all levels in implementing the Red River Landscape Boulevard investment project.

The committee stated that most residents have shown “high consensus” for the megaproject. Simultaneously, they described the banner-hanging by residents as an activity that “carries potential risks of complications to public security and order.” 

State Media Coverage: State media reports on Directive 16 have varied significantly.

  • Báo Xây dựng, one of the first outlets to report on the directive, noted that the Hà Nội Party Committee assessed the project as receiving “high consensus” from “the majority of the people.”
    • The newspaper reported the committee’s emphasis that there remained “groups and individuals who have not reached consensus,” alongside “crowd gatherings, banner-hanging, and slogan displays that carry potential risks of causing complications to public security and order.” 
    • Báo Xây dựng remains among the few outlets that still retain the detail regarding “high consensus.” 

Conversely, most major newspapers, including Tuổi Trẻ, An ninh Thủ đô, Tiền Phong, and Thanh Niên, published stories on Directive 16 but omitted details concerning “high consensus from the majority of the people” or the “crowd-gathering activities” by “groups that have not reached consensus.” 

When the “high consensus” detail was initially reported on the afternoon of June 11, many residents shared the information across Facebook groups related to the Red River Landscape Boulevard project.

  • However, by 1 p.m. on June 12, most of these posts had disappeared.

Directive 16 Missing: A reporter from Luật Khoa could not locate the full text of Directive 16 on either the Hà Nội Party Committee portal or the Hà Nội People’s Committee portal.

  • The most recent documents published on both platforms date back to May 2026.

The Background: The Red River Landscape Boulevard Project is a strategic megaproject designed to reshape the urban space along the Red River in Hà Nội. 

Shop and Support Independent Journalism
ADVERTISEMENT
  • The development passes through 16 communes and wards in the city and is expected to affect 200,000 residents. 
  • Land clearance and project implementation have been officially described as an “especially important political task” for the municipality.

Opposition From Residents: Since the project began gaining public attention in early May 2026, residents in the affected areas have fiercely opposed it through various methods. 

  • These actions include collective petitions, open letters, public appeals, banners, coordinated clothing, and group marches.
  • Residents facing clearance have demanded “no complete clearance,” the preservation of existing residential communities, transparency of information, adequate compensation, on-site resettlement, and priority for preserving village and communal culture. 

Thus far, their demands have not been satisfactorily addressed.

Why It Matters: In response to the growing public opposition, the Hà Nội government has deployed various measures to urge residents to support the land-clearance plans and to build “social consensus.” 

Among them, the city has asked residents to remove banners under the justification of maintaining “urban aesthetics.” 

Additionally, the government has established a dedicated communications task force for the Red River Landscape Boulevard project, operating with the primary goal of “orienting communications work.” 


Hoàng Nam wrote this article in Vietnamese and published it in Luật Khoa Magazine on June 12, 2026. The Vietnamese Magazine has the copyrights to the English translation.

Like this:

Like Loading…
Tags: Red River Scenic Boulevard Project
Hoàng Nam

Hoàng Nam

Related Posts

Việt Nam’s Public Security Ministry Stands by Proposal to Criminalize ‘Propaganda Against the Communist Party’
News

Việt Nam’s Public Security Ministry Stands by Proposal to Criminalize ‘Propaganda Against the Communist Party’

2 July 2026
Citing Higher Incomes, Vietnamese Police Seek to Double Penal Code Fines, Criminal Thresholds
News

Citing Higher Incomes, Vietnamese Police Seek to Double Penal Code Fines, Criminal Thresholds

2 July 2026
Nghệ An Police Arrest Lê Thị Thủy Under Article 331 Over Tân Châu Crematorium Protests 
News

Nghệ An Police Arrest Lê Thị Thủy Under Article 331 Over Tân Châu Crematorium Protests 

2 July 2026
Dr. Võ Trí Hảo Proposes Making Saigon Times Việt Nam’s First Private Newspaper
News

Dr. Võ Trí Hảo Proposes Making Saigon Times Việt Nam’s First Private Newspaper

1 July 2026
Việt Nam Social Media Users Block State News Pages Over Decree 174/2026 Fines
News

Việt Nam Social Media Users Block State News Pages Over Decree 174/2026 Fines

1 July 2026
UN Experts Urge Việt Nam to Reconsider Decree 109 and Lawyer License Revocations
News

UN Experts Urge Việt Nam to Reconsider Decree 109 and Lawyer License Revocations

1 July 2026
Next Post
Bắc Ninh Catholics Displaced, Raise Concerns Over Police-run Gia Bình International Airport Project 

Bắc Ninh Catholics Displaced, Raise Concerns Over Police-run Gia Bình International Airport Project 

Hà Nội Red River Project: Government Orders Door-to-Door Outreach Amid Public Opposition

Hà Nội Red River Project: Government Orders Door-to-Door Outreach Amid Public Opposition

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

OPINIONS

Why Stories Like the Red River Project Prove the World Still Needs Journalists Who Won’t Be Silenced

Why Stories Like the Red River Project Prove the World Still Needs Journalists Who Won’t Be Silenced

2 June 2026
Việt Nam’s 83% Satisfaction Index: Encouraging or Suspicious?

Việt Nam’s 83% Satisfaction Index: Encouraging or Suspicious?

28 May 2026
​Child Abuse in Việt Nam: Where Is the Vietnam Association for Protection of Child Rights?

​Child Abuse in Việt Nam: Where Is the Vietnam Association for Protection of Child Rights?

27 May 2026

POPULAR STORIES

  • Religion Bulletin – March 2026 – USCIRF Says Việt Nam Is Intensifying Crackdown on Independent Religious Groups as Bàni Followers Resist Renaming Effort

    Religion Bulletin – April 2026 – Việt Nam Passes Amended Religion Law As Authorities Prosecute Four Independent Protestants

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Strait of Hormuz Crisis: How Việt Nam is Handling the 2026 Global Oil Shock

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Post-1975 Tragedy: The Grim Reality of Life in Vietnam’s Re-education Camps

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Memory in Print: The Death and Resurrection of South Vietnamese Literature

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Forgotten German Veterans of Việt Nam

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
The Vietnamese Magazine

Published since 2017 by Legal Initiatives for Vietnam — a 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization.

U.S. Office: Legal Initiatives for Vietnam, 1520 E. Covell Suite B5 – 426, Davis, California, United States 95616

Taiwan Office: 美國法治越南台灣分部, 4th Floor, RIIC Building, National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, Zhinan Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan (ROC) 116

editor@thevietnamese.org

  • The Vietnamese’s Story
  • Submission
  • Sign in
No Result
View All Result
  • Sign in

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Discover more from The Vietnamese Magazine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

%d